View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Zeta Aspect Trick Member
Joined: 08 Nov 2005 Location: Vancouver, Washington |
60. Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't entirely follow your argument. Exactly why must I be a skeptic? Just because I agree with the skeptic in that example does not mean I should be a skeptic. Or maybe it does. I'll find out when you explain. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
J. S. Mill Maniac Member
Joined: 28 Apr 2003 Location: New York, New York |
61. Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 5:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ZetaAspect wrote: | Exactly why must I be a skeptic? |
Because you have conceded that the skeptics argument is the most rational.
Unless you deny rationalism, which is fine, but then you have lots of other problems. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Zeta Aspect Trick Member
Joined: 08 Nov 2005 Location: Vancouver, Washington |
62. Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I concede that it is rational in the same way that I could concede that a person who never plays DDR never loses at DDR.
I don't fully support that sort of argument.
If you know what I mean. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
J. S. Mill Maniac Member
Joined: 28 Apr 2003 Location: New York, New York |
63. Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 5:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ZetaAspect wrote: | If you know what I mean. |
Actually, I don't. Everyone else holds a position which is not rationally justified, therefore the Pyrrhonian Skeptic holds the only certain position. He's right. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Zeta Aspect Trick Member
Joined: 08 Nov 2005 Location: Vancouver, Washington |
64. Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 5:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Certain position = certain of uncertainty/unknowability.
Doesn't quite fly with me.
I suppose it is dogmatic skepticism that bothers me, as it seems...well...like a dead-end...
Isn't dogmatic skepticism even more "skeptical" than its Pyrrhonian counterpart? Why aren't you arguing dogmatic skepticism?
You use rationality as a determining factor, when the skeptic himself does not trust rationality. That is ironic.
Also, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
J. S. Mill Maniac Member
Joined: 28 Apr 2003 Location: New York, New York |
65. Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 5:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ZetaAspect wrote: | Isn't dogmatic skepticism even more "skeptical" than its Pyrrhonian counterpart? Why aren't you arguing dogmatic skepticism? |
Pyrrhonian Skepticism is the strongest known rational position.
ZetaAspect wrote: | You use rationality as a determining factor, when the skeptic himself does not trust rationality. That is ironic. |
The Pyrrhonian Skeptic is searching for the most rational position; he trusts rationality he just does not trust logic. Rationality dictates his position.
ZetaAspect wrote: | Also, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. |
I think you are missing the point, the Pyrrhonian Skeptic is not arguing that all beliefs are false, he is arguing that no beliefs are rationally justified. Give me a belief of yours which is rationally justified; for which you can give a sound rational argument in it's support. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Zeta Aspect Trick Member
Joined: 08 Nov 2005 Location: Vancouver, Washington |
66. Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Søren Kierkegaard wrote: | Pyrrhonian Skepticism is the strongest known rational position. |
What makes dogmatic skepticism less rational?
Søren Kierkegaard wrote: | Give me a belief of yours which is rationally justified; for which you can give a sound rational argument in it's support. |
Other than "cogito ergo sum"? _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
J. S. Mill Maniac Member
Joined: 28 Apr 2003 Location: New York, New York |
67. Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ZetaAspect wrote: | Other than "cogito ergo sum"? |
That is not beyond rational doubt; it's beyond all logical doubt but not beyond all rational doubt. Try to give me a rational justification for that (not a logical justification). _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Zeta Aspect Trick Member
Joined: 08 Nov 2005 Location: Vancouver, Washington |
68. Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How does one doubt the existence of the self? _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
J. S. Mill Maniac Member
Joined: 28 Apr 2003 Location: New York, New York |
69. Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 11:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ZetaAspect wrote: | How does one doubt the existence of the self? |
Easily, one doubts the universal applicability of logic. Of course logic dictates that you can not doubt the self, but just doubt that logical reasoning is valid. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Zeta Aspect Trick Member
Joined: 08 Nov 2005 Location: Vancouver, Washington |
70. Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Could you give me a definition of rational doubt as opposed to logical doubt? I can't seem to find a satisfactory explanation of the two. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
J. S. Mill Maniac Member
Joined: 28 Apr 2003 Location: New York, New York |
71. Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 5:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ZetaAspect wrote: | Could you give me a definition of rational doubt as opposed to logical doubt? I can't seem to find a satisfactory explanation of the two. |
Maximal Logical doubt: doubting everything except the laws of logic and the principle of Rationalism
Maximal Rational doubt: doubting everything except the principle of Rationalism _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kilroy(ZTC) Trick Member
Joined: 04 Mar 2005
|
72. Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 6:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Why didn't anyone kill hume. He's way more annoying than socrates |
|
Back to top |
|
|
j1ng Trick Member
Joined: 09 Feb 2005 Location: Kansas City, Kansas |
73. Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe if you play a certain line up of songs while using a certain combination of mods and difficulty levels you unlock the meaning of life and open up a wormhole to different dimensions. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|