DDR Freak :: View topic - A Priori Synthetic Epistemology of 12-Block Stepcharts

Forums FAQ

Search

Memberlist

Usergroups

Register

Profile

Login to check your private messages

Login

A Priori Synthetic Epistemology of 12-Block Stepcharts
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3

This topic is locked you cannot edit posts or make replies

DDR Freak Forum Index -> In the Groove

View previous topic :: View next topic

Author

Message

PedanticOmbudsman
Trick Member

Trick Member

Joined: 07 Jan 2005
Location: Fayetteville, AR

40.

Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2005 8:34 pm Post subject:

Reply with quote

MadTaco wrote:

Milo & Otis is a kickass movie.

Cited for veracity.

Send private message

MadTaco
Trick Member

Trick Member

Joined: 26 Apr 2005

41. Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2005 10:30 pm Post subject:

Thank you. I did hope I was not the only one who was aware of such a fact. _________________ That blob guy......he's here every day!

Send private message

J. S. Mill
Maniac Member

Maniac Member

Joined: 28 Apr 2003
Location: New York, New York

42.

Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 4:17 am Post subject:

Reply with quote

HTP.ARRR wrote:

You are clearly correct; forgive me for the erroneous reasoning.

I would sooner call the Sistine Chapel superficial then categorize the sophistication of your reason as erroneous.

HTP.ARRR wrote:

In theory I am inclined to value adherence to the ethical code over the presence of ability, but in practice I have yet to see a player whose ethics has not brought about a corresponding increase in ability.

Strong point, I didn't consider it. Here's a question, does evidential strength necessity only probability or positive correlation? Is it possible there is a statistical confounding element? I'll let you take the lead on this one.

HTP.ARRR wrote:

Of course ability in the absence of ethics is prevalent, which begs a difficult question: is ability that is not the product of reason (or any conscious reflection, possibly) a virtue? The answer is obvious if we accept the Categorical Imperative, but I think I can anticipate your Existentialist objection. But do you think that any of the classical objections to the Categorical Imperative are applicable given the specific epistemic nature of ITG? This is an extremely speculative line of reasoning of course but I would like to know your thoughts on the matter.

Absolutely fascinating. On the one hand, I want to cite Heidegger and Sartre and argue that yes, Existentialist reasoning is universally convertable even in specific instanciations such as competivie gamesmanship. On the other hand, the very pillars of Existentialist reasoning are based on Adaptability and Relativity, so such a Categorical answer seems to completely miss the mark. I am inclined to research what Dostoevsky had to say on this matter, may I ask you for a few days to research my response?
_________________

Send private message

Send email

Visit posters website

AOL Instant Messenger

Yahoo Messenger

Xbox Live Gamertag

MSN Messenger

agent709 (orange)
Trick Member

Trick Member

Joined: 13 Jun 2005

43. Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 10:23 am Post subject:

Don't exclude the theory of the Phallic Property. c=8. _________________

Send private message

Display posts from previous:

	DDR Freak Forum Index -> In the Groove	All times are GMT - 8 Hours Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB 2 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group